The Dishonor of the With Honors System

Share with Friends
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    209
    Shares

Many years ago, the eighth graders at the junior high where I taught participated in a promotion ceremony. The band  played, students delivered speeches and everyone paraded up to the podium to greet teachers and administrators when their names were announced to a capacity crowd.

I  had the distinct pleasure of calling the roll, a simple task, as long as you don’t miss the designations of “M” and “H” at the end of many surnames.

A student with an “H” is promoted “with honors,” meaning her GPA was 3.5 or higher. The “M’s” are “with merit.”

As I announced the names, in my best emcee voice, I wondered what inflection I should use for an “average” student, who didn’t graduate with honors. Should I use a monotone voice for the riffraff that dared to march with student royalty? Perhaps a pregnant pause, prior to shouting with honors,” in my best vibrato.

In the end, I decided to use the same voice for all students. After all, I couldn’t see a difference in them, before the medals were handed out.

When the ceremony was over, my sense of pride in announcing the names of the graduates was eroded by the realization that there is nothing honorable about the “with honors” system.

While I was often considered for the job, I never called the names of graduates again.

The following two tabs change content below.
Anonymous
Mark Barnes is the author of many education books, including Bestseller Hacking Education, part of his Hack Learning Series, books that solve big problems with simple ideas. Barnes presents internationally on assessment, connected education, and student-centered learning. Join more than 100,000 interested educators who follow @markbarnes19 on Twitter.
Tags:
4 Comments
  1. David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E.
  2. David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

CommentLuv badge